Project Management Workflow
Overview
Our project management workflow combines modern development practices with systematic planning, tracking, and delivery processes for documentation and development projects.
Project Management Philosophy
- Agile Principles: Iterative development with continuous feedback
- Documentation-Driven: Comprehensive documentation as a first-class citizen
- Tool Integration: Seamless integration between planning and execution tools
- Quality Focus: Built-in quality assurance and review processes
- Continuous Improvement: Regular retrospectives and process optimization
Planning & Organization
Project Structure
Project Lifecycle:
1. Initiation & Planning
├── Requirements gathering
├── Scope definition
├── Resource allocation
└── Timeline establishment
2. Design & Architecture
├── Technical design
├── Documentation structure
├── Tool selection
└── Workflow definition
3. Development & Creation
├── Content development
├── Code implementation
├── Quality assurance
└── Testing & validation
4. Deployment & Release
├── Production deployment
├── Performance monitoring
├── User feedback collection
└── Post-launch optimization
5. Maintenance & Evolution
├── Regular updates
├── Bug fixes
├── Feature enhancements
└── Continuous improvement
Project Initialization
# Project Charter Template
## Project Overview
- **Name**: Project Name
- **Description**: Brief project description
- **Goals**: Primary objectives
- **Success Criteria**: Measurable outcomes
- **Timeline**: Key milestones and deadlines
- **Resources**: Team members and tools required
## Scope
- **In Scope**: What will be delivered
- **Out of Scope**: What will not be included
- **Assumptions**: Key assumptions made
- **Constraints**: Known limitations
- **Dependencies**: External dependencies
## Stakeholders
- **Project Owner**: Decision maker
- **Team Members**: Contributors and roles
- **End Users**: Target audience
- **Reviewers**: Quality assurance reviewers
Task Management & Tracking
GitHub Issues Integration
# Issue templates for consistent tracking
name: Feature Request
about: Propose a new feature or enhancement
title: '[FEATURE] Brief description'
labels: 'enhancement, needs-review'
assignees: ''
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
## Feature Description
Clear description of the proposed feature
## Use Case
Who will use this feature and why?
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criteria 1
- [ ] Criteria 2
- [ ] Criteria 3
## Technical Considerations
Any technical requirements or constraints
Project Boards & Workflows
GitHub Project Board Structure:
├── 📋 Backlog
│ ├── Ideas & proposals
│ ├── Future enhancements
│ └── Research tasks
├── 🎯 To Do
│ ├── Prioritized tasks
│ ├── Sprint ready items
│ └── Well-defined requirements
├── 🚧 In Progress
│ ├── Currently active work
│ ├── Assigned to team members
│ └── Time-boxed tasks
├── 👀 Review
│ ├── Pending review
│ ├── Quality assurance
│ └── Stakeholder approval
└── ✅ Done
├── Completed tasks
├── Deployed features
└── Closed issues
Development Workflow Integration
Sprint Planning
# Sprint Planning Template
## Sprint Goal
Clear, concise sprint objective
## Sprint Backlog
- [ ] Task 1 (Story Points: 3)
- [ ] Task 2 (Story Points: 5)
- [ ] Task 3 (Story Points: 2)
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Code/content completed
- [ ] Tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Peer review completed
- [ ] Deployed to staging
- [ ] Stakeholder approval
- [ ] Production deployment
## Sprint Capacity
- Team members: 2
- Sprint duration: 2 weeks
- Available capacity: 60 hours
- Planned story points: 20
Daily Workflow
# Daily development routine
# 1. Check project board for assigned tasks
gh project view --owner username --number 1
# 2. Create feature branch for new work
git checkout -b feature/task-description
# 3. Update task status to "In Progress"
gh issue edit 123 --add-label "in-progress"
# 4. Work on task with regular commits
git add .
git commit -m "feat: implement feature component"
# 5. Push work and create PR when ready
git push origin feature/task-description
gh pr create --title "Feature: Task Description" --body "Closes #123"
# 6. Move task to "Review" when PR is created
gh issue edit 123 --add-label "review" --remove-label "in-progress"
Quality Assurance Process
Review Workflows
# Pull Request Template
name: Pull Request Review
about: Standard PR review process
## Changes Made
- Brief description of changes
- Link to related issues
## Testing
- [ ] Local testing completed
- [ ] All tests passing
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Screenshots included (if UI changes)
## Review Checklist
- [ ] Code quality meets standards
- [ ] Documentation is accurate
- [ ] No breaking changes
- [ ] Performance impact considered
- [ ] Security implications reviewed
## Deployment Notes
Any special deployment considerations
Quality Gates
Quality Assurance Gates:
1. Code/Content Review
├── Peer review completed
├── Standards compliance verified
├── Best practices followed
└── Documentation updated
2. Automated Testing
├── Unit tests passing
├── Integration tests passing
├── Link validation completed
└── Build verification successful
3. Manual Testing
├── Functionality verified
├── User experience tested
├── Cross-platform compatibility
└── Performance benchmarks met
4. Stakeholder Approval
├── Requirements met
├── Acceptance criteria satisfied
├── User feedback incorporated
└── Ready for production
Communication & Collaboration
Team Communication
# Communication Protocols
## Daily Standups (Async)
- What did you accomplish yesterday?
- What will you work on today?
- Any blockers or dependencies?
- Post in #development-updates channel
## Weekly Reviews
- Sprint progress review
- Blocker resolution
- Upcoming priorities
- Process improvements
## Monthly Retrospectives
- What went well?
- What could be improved?
- Action items for next month
- Process adjustments
Documentation Standards
# Documentation Requirements
## Code Documentation
- Inline comments for complex logic
- README files for all projects
- API documentation for interfaces
- Setup and installation guides
## Process Documentation
- Workflow descriptions
- Tool configurations
- Best practices guides
- Troubleshooting resources
## Decision Records
- Architecture decisions
- Tool selection rationale
- Process changes
- Lessons learned
Metrics & Analytics
Project Metrics
# Key Performance Indicators
Development Metrics:
- Velocity: Story points per sprint
- Lead Time: Idea to production time
- Cycle Time: Development start to completion
- Deployment Frequency: Releases per week/month
- Change Failure Rate: Failed deployments percentage
- Recovery Time: Time to fix failed deployments
Quality Metrics:
- Bug Discovery Rate: Issues found post-release
- Test Coverage: Percentage of code/content tested
- Review Turnaround: Time from PR to merge
- Documentation Coverage: Documentation completeness
- User Satisfaction: Feedback scores and surveys
Process Metrics:
- Sprint Goal Achievement: Goals met percentage
- Planning Accuracy: Estimation vs. actual time
- Team Utilization: Capacity utilization rate
- Process Efficiency: Time spent on non-value activities
Tracking & Reporting
# Automated metrics collection
# GitHub CLI scripts for project analytics
# Sprint velocity calculation
gh issue list --state closed --label sprint-1 --json number,assignees,labels \
| jq '.[] | select(.labels[].name | contains("story-points")) | .labels[] | select(.name | startswith("sp-")) | .name[3:]' \
| paste -sd+ | bc
# Lead time analysis
gh pr list --state merged --json mergedAt,createdAt \
| jq '.[] | ((.mergedAt | fromdateiso8601) - (.createdAt | fromdateiso8601)) / 86400'
# Deployment frequency
gh workflow run list --workflow deploy.yml --created ">=2024-01-01" --json conclusion \
| jq '[.[] | select(.conclusion == "success")] | length'
Risk Management
Risk Identification
# Risk Assessment Matrix
## Technical Risks
- Dependencies: External tool/service dependencies
- Complexity: Technical complexity beyond team capability
- Performance: Scalability and performance constraints
- Security: Data protection and access control
## Project Risks
- Scope Creep: Uncontrolled expansion of requirements
- Resource Constraints: Team availability and skill gaps
- Timeline Pressure: Unrealistic deadlines and expectations
- Communication: Misaligned expectations and requirements
## Mitigation Strategies
- Regular risk reviews and updates
- Contingency planning for high-impact risks
- Early warning systems and escalation procedures
- Cross-training and knowledge sharing
Continuous Improvement
Retrospective Process
# Sprint Retrospective Template
## What Went Well
- Achievements and successes
- Effective processes and tools
- Team collaboration highlights
- Quality improvements
## What Could Be Improved
- Process inefficiencies
- Tool limitations
- Communication gaps
- Quality issues
## Action Items
- [ ] Specific improvement action 1 (Owner: Name, Due: Date)
- [ ] Specific improvement action 2 (Owner: Name, Due: Date)
- [ ] Process change implementation (Owner: Name, Due: Date)
## Experiment for Next Sprint
One small process change to try next sprint
Process Evolution
# Continuous Improvement Cycle
1. Measure Current State
- Collect baseline metrics
- Document current processes
- Identify pain points
2. Identify Improvements
- Team feedback collection
- Industry best practices research
- Tool evaluation and selection
3. Plan Changes
- Small, incremental improvements
- Clear success criteria
- Implementation timeline
4. Implement & Monitor
- Pilot changes with small scope
- Collect feedback and metrics
- Adjust based on results
5. Standardize & Scale
- Document successful changes
- Train team on new processes
- Scale to larger scope
Tool Integration & Automation
Workflow Automation
# GitHub Actions for project management
name: Project Management Automation
on:
issues:
types: [opened, closed, assigned]
pull_request:
types: [opened, closed, merged]
jobs:
update-project:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Move issue to "In Progress" when assigned
if: github.event.action == 'assigned'
run: |
gh project item-edit --id ${{ github.event.issue.node_id }} \
--field-name "Status" --field-value "In Progress"
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Move PR to "Review" when opened
if: github.event.action == 'opened' && github.event_name == 'pull_request'
run: |
gh project item-add ${{ github.event.pull_request.node_id }} \
--field-name "Status" --field-value "Review"
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Integration Ecosystem
- GitHub: Issues, projects, and repository management
- Cursor IDE: Development environment with project context
- Claude AI: Planning assistance and documentation generation
- mdBook: Documentation creation and maintenance
- GitHub Actions: Automation and workflow orchestration